domingo, 30 de abril de 2017

Cambodia clothing company article opinion

Dear Sir or Madam:


I am writing this letter in order to express my opinion regarding the article about the shop of T-shirts that are being sold for a very low Price and that are being made in Bangladesh; because I know that you receive the opinions of the readers and that you often publish them afterwards on the newspaper.


First of all, I would like to make clear that the posture that I have supports the fact that there should always and constantly be skepticism towards selling companies, and that awareness about the slavery implied should always be promoted.


We should always remain skeptical towards all businesses that sell any kind of product or service, regardless of the appearance and idea that the shops are generating for themselves, because who knows where the law is since modern slavery keeps on existing. We should never prejudice or be fooled by the price or the story that the company is trying to form in our minds about it. It may seem logical that the cheapest brands are the ones that implement more slavery because they can charge less since they pay their employees less, but that does not mean that expensive stores do not stop giving their workers the sufficient amount of money.


I am as well impressed by the degree to which people can be indifferent and apathetic towards subjects with such an impact and relevance such as modern slavery, and I am extremely glad to know about the existence of the few people that care to make a change. We should never stop promoting awareness by whichever way we can, because whether the uninvolved care not, hideous consequences are being provoked.

With sincere appreciation,

Anja Von der Meden Klein.

miércoles, 25 de enero de 2017

Personal response: Hubert Humphrey

I am writing this entry in order to share the personal response that I have regarding a certain quote said by Hubert Humphrey which states that the moral test of government is how it treats those who are in the dawn of life, the children; those who are in the twilight of life, the aged; and those in the shadows of life.

After thinking a while, I ended up agreeing with the author as I concluded: childhood is the optimal moment in a person’s life to be ideologically influenced, so there’s no better way of telling the intentions and moral of a government than observing what it’s making children learn; the degree in which a government is authentically meant for the wellbeing of the people rather than personal purposes is seen in the way they treat the aged and needy ones, since these are the most likely to be of no practical use for society.


For example, in Nazi Germany "There were to be two basic educational ideas in his ideal state. First, there must be burnt into the heart and brains of youth the sense of race. Second, German youth must be made ready for war, educated for victory or death. The ultimate purpose of education was to fashion citizens conscious of the glory of country and filled with fanatical devotion to the national cause.", as John Simkin quotes from Louis L. Snyder.

References:
  • http://spartacus-educational.com/GEReducation.htm

jueves, 19 de enero de 2017

Personal response to Any sufficiently advanced technology is undistinguishable from magic

As the title has already told you, this entry will consist of a personal response I decided to make regarding an idea said by the British writer Arthur C. Clarke, which states that any sufficiently advanced technology is undistinguishable from magic.
Now, allow me to explain my posture which is one of disagreement, but first of all, I consider it would be adequate to share with you my definitions of “magic”, with which I will be working: “magic” is any practice or technique that uses supernatural powers as the means to produce an effect.

Since real human technology* (at least the entire one I know) is not created by illogical supernatural forces, but by concrete, tangible scientific procedures, everything implied in real technological phenomena can be explained by science. Some people may not be able to understand it, but this does not make real technology undistinguishable or impossible to tell from magic.

LEARN TO WRITE, ARTHUR.
*I emphasized “real” because magic would be a kind of technology according to definitions, and as far as I know, magic is not real (sad muggle life… or am I faking? >;]).