Several similarities both texts share are:
The two articles describe an issue by its objective facts;
however, they also contain elements of subjectivism (such as adjectives and adverbs) in their narration, making them argumentative;
and regarding the inner structure, the articles both engage an issue of political nature.
As for the differences between the two textes,
- "Not So Divided After All on Foreign Policy" uses statistical information;
- this last article talks about an issue regarding the consecuences of Donald Trump's political oaths, while "A Coup Against the Supreme Court" refers to a problem of bias in the followers of this candidate;
- and "A Coup Against the Supreme Court" begins with a non-related to the specific issue introduction, it is rather set to strenghten the author's opinion.
The elements of "A Coup Against the Supreme Court" will be marked with a "👍" in the following list:
- Introduction, body and conclusion 👍
- An objective explanation of the issue
- A timely news angle 👍
- Opinions from the opposing viewpoint that refute directly the same issues the writer addresses 👍
- The opinions of the writer delivered in a professional manner 👍
- Alternative solutions to the problem or issue being criticized 👍
- A solid and concise conclusion that powerfully summarizes the writer's opinion
Now, regarding "Not So Divided After All on Foreign Policy":
- Introduction, body and conclusion👍
- An objective explanation of the issue
- A timely news angle 👍
- Opinions from the opposing viewpoint that refute directly the same issues the writer addresses 👍
- The opinions of the writer delivered in a professional manner
- Alternative solutions to the problem or issue being criticized 👍
- A solid and concise conclusion that powerfully summarizes the writer's opinion 👍
GOOD JOB
ResponderEliminar